Standblog

Tristan Nitot sur les standards du Web, les navigateurs et la technologie

Aller au contenu | Aller au menu | Aller à la recherche

Mot-clé - manifesto

Fil des billets - Fil des commentaires

samedi 3 mars 2007

Discussing the Mozilla Manifesto, part 9/10

The Mozilla Foundation pledge, which follows the 10 principles and the call to action, needs almost no additional explanation. We find there all the important keywords that make the Mozilla project so special:

  • Open source, great consumer products produced by a community;
  • Keeping the Internet an open platform.

This is already what we do on a daily basis. What is more surprising is the following:

  1. promote models for creating economic value for the public benefit
  2. promote the Mozilla Manifesto principles in public discourse and within the Internet industry

Both points come on top of what is commonly perceived as the Mozilla efforts of promoting choice and innovation.

Since I'll be away, comments are closed on my blog. But readers and Mozilla contributors are invited to discuss the Mozilla Manifesto on the Mozilla.Governance mailing list / newsgroup.

vendredi 2 mars 2007

Discussing the Mozilla Manifesto, part 8/10

(...) For individuals, one very effective way to support the Manifesto is to use Mozilla Firefox and other open source products that embody the principles of the Manifesto.

This is a call to action for millions of individuals. Alone, none of us can apparently do anything significant to preserve the public nature of the Internet. But in Using Firefox, one can make a statement about this, because it's open source, standards-compliant, available on several important platforms. Of course, this comes on top of the advantages of using a modern, full-featured, more secure browser.

Since I'll be away, comments are closed on my blog. But readers and Mozilla contributors are invited to discuss the Mozilla Manifesto on the Mozilla.Governance mailing list / newsgroup.

jeudi 1 mars 2007

Discussing the Mozilla Manifesto, part 7/10

Principle #9:

Commercial involvement in the development of the Internet brings many benefits; a balance between commercial goals and public benefit is critical.

I like this notion of balance between commercial and public goals. We should not forget that commercial approaches have been important to make the Web what it is now. The Mozilla project itself reflects this, as its roots are with Netscape and then AOL. But this should not mean in any way that we should rely solely on the commercial approach for the Internet to reach its full potential[1].

Principle #10:

Magnifying the public benefit aspects of the Internet is an important goal, worthy of time, attention and commitment.

While the beginning of the first principle was obvious for anyone (The Internet is an integral part of modern life), this is probably less true for the 10th principle. Many people tend to believe that the Internet could be a 100% pure commercial space, that could be left to commercial interests which would take care of it. Like stated earlier on, a balance between commercial goals and public benefit is critical. We, contributors to the Mozilla project, have not forgotten that the market forces have proven to be very inefficient when Microsoft was about to get a monopoly, and when that monopoly state was reached. Actually, the Mozilla project, to some extent, was created to prevent such a monopoly, and succeeded in bringing back choice and innovation on the browser market with Firefox. For now, the commercial sector on the Internet is the most visible, but it has to be balanced by organizations who put the public interest above all.

Since I'll be away, comments are closed on my blog. But readers and Mozilla contributors are invited to discuss the Mozilla Manifesto on the Mozilla.Governance mailing list / newsgroup.

Notes

[1] I know, I'm using the W3C's tag line again! But it really is very close to what I perceive as one of the top goals expressed by the Mozilla Manifesto.

mercredi 28 février 2007

Discussing the Mozilla Manifesto, part 6/10

Principle #7:

Free and open source software promotes the development of the Internet as a public resource.

Most, if not all, of my readers know that the Internet is running mostly on free and open-source software, at least on the server side. But the Manifesto is not just talking about this aspect of things: open source software limits the odds of having a proprietary approach of the Internet.

It is also to noted that both free software and open source software are mentioned in this principle. This is, in my opinion, that Mozilla is not taking side between the two camps, even if the "open source" expression is more often used, since there is no possible confusion between "free as in 'speech'" and "free as in 'beer'".

Principle #8:

Transparent community-based development processes promote participation, accountability, and trust.

This principle can actually be split in two:

  1. Transparency leads to accountability and then trust. If the Internet is a public resource, then it must be owned by the public. For the public to trust it, there must be accountability, which derives from transparency.
  2. community-based development processes promote participation, then trust. As not everyone can judge of the quality of project as complex as Firefox or Thunderbird without getting deeply involved in it. Therefore the project has to be open to anyone to contribute, with contribution being peer-reviewed.

Since I'll be away, comments are closed on my blog. But readers and Mozilla contributors are invited to discuss the Mozilla Manifesto on the Mozilla.Governance mailing list / newsgroup.

mardi 27 février 2007

Discussing the Mozilla Manifesto, part 5/10

Principle Number 6:

The effectiveness of the Internet as a public resource depends upon interoperability (protocols, data formats, content), innovation and decentralized participation worldwide.

As a Standardista myself, this principle is one of the most important. The Web is what is is – a global public resource – thanks to interoperability. Too many of us take this for granted, but it's not, actually. As the Web grows, it becomes more an more tempting for large organizations to own a part of it. To fully understand the importance of interoperability, are are two anecdotes:

  1. I remember how hard it was for me to share documents with friends, before connectivity became mainstream. I had a Mac (yes, already), and sharing a document mixing text and images was a total pain! Floppy disks used different formats on Mac and PCs, different character sets (I needed accents for my French docs), and different file formats. Now with Wikis, blogs, email, sharing is much easier than before. I can share my pictures with millions of people in a minute.
  2. Two parts of the Internet which are not interoperable are Instant Messaging and VOIP. If you want to send instant messages to friends, you have to make sure that they use the same system as yours. If not, then you'll have to subscribe to the same network as theirs, install a specific piece of software (which may or may not be available for your OS of choice). Things are pretty much the same with VOIP. You have to choose your network and tools (Skype, Wengo, Gizmo...) to match the choices of your friends. Could we imagine something similar with traditional phones? Would the phone industry had reached such a broad audience if people had to subscribe to different phone operators, own a different phone for each company, and make sure to use the right one for reaching specific people? No.

As we can see, Interoperability is key if we want the Internet to reach its full potential[1]. But for this, we need to understand that corporate interests may think differently: to maximize their own profits (by making a part of the Internet proprietary), they may make choices that would reduce the overall value of the Internet.

Let's now revisit the end of principle number 6:

The effectiveness of the Internet as a public resource depends upon (...) decentralized participation worldwide.

This is another very interesting feature of the Internet, and one that helps making it a public resource: there is no central point of entry. You don't have to ask authorization to any specific organization to "set up shop" (or any other of kind of site). You just need connectivity, an IP address, an inexpensive server and a domain name – all of these are available in virtually unlimited supplies – and there you go! You can invent, innovate, experiment, share, publish, leverage existing resources, provided that you respect existing standards. Restriction may applies, but it's very unlikely that some so-called authority will shut down your servers (this may be a reason why there are so many scams on the Internet, by the way).

Since I'll be away, comments are closed on my blog. But readers and Mozilla contributors are invited to discuss the Mozilla Manifesto on the Mozilla.Governance mailing list / newsgroup.

Notes

[1] I'm using W3C's tag line here on purpose.

- page 2 de 4 -